Labels

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

From Berkshire Annual Meeting 2008


  • Munger : The key is not to be seduced by crazy ideas, but instead just stick to the fundamentals year after year. Academia doesn't get too interested in us -- we're too simple. What would the professors do? A great many of the formulas [they use to analyze securities and markets] are dead wrong. They exist purely to give the intellectual class something to do. We don't do anything just exercise our intellectual proclivity for mathematical formulas."
  • Then Buffet said one of the most remarkable things I've ever heard him say: "There's no reason we should become fearful if a stock goes down. If a stock goes down 50%, I'd look forward to it. In fact, I would offer you a significant sum of money if you could give me the opportunity for all of my stocks to go down 50% over the next month."
  • Q: You said before that one of the things you look for in businesses you're buying is good managers. To me, that's a hard judgment to make if you haven't known him for long on a personal level. How do you go about figuring that out about somebody?
    WB: We're buying businesses where the managers come with it, so I do have a record [I can judge]. If I had to pick out the five people in this group here who would be the best managers, I wouldn't know how to do it. I mean, you all have great IQs, great academic records. You've all shown the energy to get into school.
  • Can I pick out the five best? I don't think I can do it. What I can do, when I've seen somebody run a business for 20 years, is decide whether they're going to keep behaving in the future as they have in the past. So when I buy a business - it's the biggest question I ask - "Do they love the money, or do they love the business?" [One giveaway is] if they auction the business. We've never bought a business at an auction.
    I got a fax from a fellow named Peter Liegl from Forest River. I said, "Pete, send me the last few audits and I'll call you tomorrow" Never met him, never heard of the company. (It's a RV company.) So I called him that afternoon. I said, "Pete, here's what I'll do. And if it works for you, fine." I'd never met the guy, but I could still tell by just the way he presented it and his thinking on it.
    I said to him, "Pete, what kind of salary would you like"; this is a company that did a billion seven last year. That's not the way they teach you to do it in business school, but I don't want anybody working for me that has a compensation system they're unhappy with. And he said, "I don't know." And I said, "Well, just tell me because I want you to be happy. You have to run this thing." "Well," he took a little while, "Well," he said, "I looked at the proxy statement, you make $100,000. I wouldn't want to make more than you do." So that became his salary.
    I said, "I want you to have a percentage interest in future earnings above this level," which we worked out. But he offered $100,000 and I offered the percentage above that. I've never seen this place. I hope it's there. [Laughter] Pete may have some 11-year-old kid in there that says, "What figure shall we send Warren?" [Laughter]
    He doesn't need the job. As long as that thing is a lot of fun for him, he's going to keep running it. [I get offered all] kinds of deals from LBO operators. I would just love to bet against the projections of every one that they give me. They hand me these books, which I don't even want to look at, and of course they always just project like that [points upward like a graph that only increases]. I would just love to make a career out of betting against the figures presented in those books, but I don't get a chance to do that. If you ever get a chance to short investment banker books, that would be a great activity.
  • We don't think about cost of capital or risk-adjusted. I mean, we don't want to take any risk, and we don't. That doesn't mean we don't do things that are wrong, but we are not doing anything that risks real losses.

    And as I said earlier [regarding stock holdings], we would have sold the thing to do something that offered even better opportunity. If it's going to permanently lose money, I reserve the right to sell it, and if it has labor problems, I reserve the right to sell it. They've been there for 20-plus years, those principles. But we believe in them. We follow through on them.
    The smaller capital expenditures, or even fairly large ones at the subsidiaries, they just do them themselves. They don't need me, because if some guy comes in to me and talks about something in the yarn plant or something in Georgia, what the hell do I know about it? If I say the internal rate of return we demand is 15.83, it'll be 15.84. I mean, you just can bet on it. We don't go through those charades. And it saves my time, saves their time.
  • There isn't one security that I've got in the portfolio that I look at as-in terms of risky - in the sense of permanent capital loss. They can go down 50%.
    Berkshire Hathaway (
    BRKA, Fortune 500) stock itself has gone down 50% three times since I bought the first stock in at 7 3/8. In 1974 it got cut in half. In 1987 it got cut in half. In 1998, 2000 or so it got cut in half. So that doesn't make any difference. I mean, I just don't worry about it. I worry about permanent loss of capital. I worry about making the right businesses. I worry about keeping the managers happy. Everything else pretty much takes care of itself.
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc. says its first-quarter profit fell 64%, because it recorded an unrealized $1.6 billion loss on its derivative contracts. BRK.A reported net income of $940 million, or $607 per share, in the quarter ended March 31. That's down significantly from the net income of $2.6 billion Berkshire generated a year ago.
    Warren Buffett, warned shareholders in his annual letter that the derivatives could make the company's earnings volatile. But Buffett predicted the derivatives will ultimately be profitable.
    The four analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial expected earnings per share of $1,476.99 on average.

Friday, April 25, 2008

From Charles Hugh Smith : Where is the bottom in housing ?

What's a sound business proposition? making a profit from day one. At the real bottom in real estate cycles, you can buy a house or apartment and rent it out at market rates--and make a profit on day one in cash-accounting terms.

1. down payment. The down payment isn't "free": you could be earning 3% or so in a money market/T-bill. As pathetic as that is, it's not zero. If the down payment isn't earning more than 3%, then why bother buying real estate?

2. mortgage/borrowed money. This is self-evident. But wait--there's more!

3. property management. Even if you do it yourself, it's not "free"; nobody's time is free. The standard fee is abour 5-6% to handle the rental and collect the rent. This does not cover gardening, upkeep, repairs, etc.--those are extra. Plus somebody has to respond to tenant complaints. That's not free, either.

4. property taxes. Like weeds, these just grow constantly. Don't forget the special assessments.

5. advertising/marketing. Sure, craigslist is free--but somebody has to meet prospective tenants, process their rental applications, check their credit, etc. Maybe that's included in your property management fee, maybe not.

6. auto/truck expenses. hauling stuff to the dump and driving to Lowes/Home Cheepo isn't free.

7. cleaning and maintenance. When the tenant moves out, the place isn't perfect, no matter what you hope/what the lease says. (And how good is that lease, anyway? Better add a couple hundred bucks for attorney's fees if you're smart.)

Ah, maintenance. That covers quite a few costly items: appliances that die, carpets that wear out, hardwood floors stained by cat pee/soggy house plants, furnace filters, paint that gets grimy, etc. Many pros figure 10% of the rent goes (eventually) to repairs/maintenance.

8. Insurance. It's nice if you could get homeowner's coverage, but you can't--your rental is a commercial property. Now you need liability coverage, too, not just fire insurance. Nothing like a tenant "tripping on the broken concrete" to remind you of that.

9. repairs. A building is a living thing which breaks down over time--expecially if it's a cheaply built, poorly constructed McMansion/condo. Windows break, paint peels, roofing leaks, flashing rusts, stairs rot, crummy veneer flooring delaminates, the list is endless.

10. utilities. Many landlords pay for water, but maybe you won't.

11. fees and licenses. Your city or county probably wants some business license fees from your landlording business. One way or another, there's sure to be some fees or licensing costs somewhere. Maybe the city inspects the property for safety--and bills you. Some agency or municipality is sure to assess you something beyond property tax.

12. Vacancies. Yes, some premium properties are rarely empty, but don't fool yourself--the pros know vacancies are a fact of rental real estate life. Most figure 5% (for premium properties) to 10% (for less than premium).

OK, so let's say a rental property rents for $1,500/month in the real world. In my neck of the woods, this would be a small 2-bedroom, 1-bath bungalow.

To keep things simple. let's say the rental costs $300,000 and the owner bought it with no down payment. According to zillow.com's mortgage estimation tool, a $300K mortgage at 6% (30-year fixed-rate) costs $2,124/month or $25,500 a year.

A rough guesstimate of all the non-mortgage expenses listed above for a $300K property comes to between $8,000 and $9,000, so let's take the lower number. (Insurance and other costs vary widely, too.) $8K + $25K = $33K in expenses against $18K in annual income. A $15,000 per year loss is not a good business proposition.

So let's drop the price down to $150,000. The mortgage drops to $1,224/month or $14,600 annually. Let's shave another $1,000 off the property tax (too bad for the city/ county depending onrising property tax revenues) and assume all non-mortgage expenses can be reduced to $6,000 per year. $14.5K + $6K = $20.5K versus $18,000 rental income: we're down to a $2,500 annual loss.

So let's ratchet the pruchase price down to $130,000. Now the mortgage is only $13,000 a year and the non-mortgage expenses, well let's say they're down to $5,500 a year. $13K + $5.5K = $18.5K against $18K in rental income. Hey, we're finally getting close to breakeven here. An actual, honest profit is just around the corner.

So let's assume a purchase price of $126,000 for the house which rents for $1,500 per month ($18,000 a year). Now at long last we can anticipate a modest profit--unless of course the property sits vacant more than a few weeks out of the year.

Real estate investment pros have a rule of thumb for establishing fair value of rental property. Multiply the annual gross rental by between 6 and 10; that gives you a "business" estimate of the value of the rental. In not-so-great neighborhoods, a multiple of 6 is standard; a house that rents for $18,000 a year would thus be worth $108,000. A moderate neighborhood would fetch a multiple of 7--magically, our $126,000 number. Premium neighborhoods (where it is presumed you can raise the rents) may be worth 8 to 10 times gross annual rents.

So even in a wonderful neighborhood with terrific schools and other assets, a house renting for $18,000 a year is worth no more than $175,000--as a business proposition. Of course you can pay more, but you're paying for "blue sky," not an asset that can be sold on the open market as a business proposition.

It's easy to multiply a number by 7. That big house down the street that rents for $3,000 a month/$36,000 a year? At the real "bottom," that house will sell for about $250,000 (or less). That condo which rents for $1,200/month/$14,000 a year? $100,000, tops. And so on.

And what's a time-tested method of figuring that price? Seven times gross annual rental income.

Friday, April 04, 2008

CA SDI questions. Can we deduct from Schedule A itemized state taxes ?

Are you asking about deducting SDI that you paid, or having to report SDI benefits (disability benefits) that you received?Disability benefits that you receive from the state (California) are nontaxable and you do not need to report it.For the SDI insurance contributions you paid through your paycheck as a withholding, you can deduct them against your federal tax (if you itemize) as a state tax deduction if the contribution appears on your W-2 as "SDI" or "CASDI". The alternate, voluntary program that appears as "VDI", "VPDI" or "CA VPDI" is nondeductible.

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Intelligence is the capacity to perceive the essential , the "what is". J Krishnamurthi

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

MUST READ

It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."

See debt

Monday, March 24, 2008

Should change the name of this blog to foolishcontrarian.blogspot.com based on AMR debacle. If had bought a house would have looked more of a genius than I do now :(

Saturday, March 22, 2008

God's sugar daddy
LEAH McLAREN

"His earliest virtues," Lauren Templeton explains, "were thrift, an industrious nature, wild curiosity and a quiet self-assuredness."

The law office overlooked Winchester's main square, so Harvey could see the courthouse where auctions were held when the bank foreclosed on farms. "When the auctions failed to produce a highest bidder," writes Lauren Templeton in Investing the Templeton Way, the book she and her husband, Scott Phillips have just published, "Harvey Sr. would leave his office and bid … usually able to buy farms for a few cents on the dollar.
"Uncle John's observation of this practice as a young boy is likely the very first seed of this most famous investing approach, which he coined, buying at the point of 'maximum pessimism.' "
Of course, "buy low, sell high" is an old stock-market maxim, but it takes courage to follow through. And as Mr. Templeton has wryly put it, "usually God favours the people who try to do good. So, when you find the crowd is desperately trying to sell, help them and buy. When you find that the crowd is desperately trying to buy, help them and sell. It usually works out."
This kind of gutsiness got him his start as an investor. In 1939, he was young and living in a seedy Manhattan walk-up when he took an almost unthinkable risk. He borrowed $10,000 and bought $100 worth of every stock then valued at less than $1 a share on the New York Stock Exchange. It looked like madness, but Germany had just invaded Poland and he felt the looming war would drive up the market. All but four of 104 stocks he bought turned a profit.
His ability to calculate risk and sense a payoff proved uncanny and consistent. Sixty years later, the same man who bought low as conflict loomed sold high just as the tech bubble was about to burst.
It also may have been the seed of his mythic frugality. Despite his vast wealth, he flies economy class and long ago renounced his citizenship and took up residence in the Bahamas, a tax haven with a wonderful climate.
Lauren Templeton says "the accumulation of money was merely a way for him to measure his progress. He wasn't out buying Rolexes, that's for sure. This is a man who made $200-million off Kia automobile stocks, but for many years thought a Kia was too expensive to buy. Bargain-hunting affected every part of his life."
"He's like John D. Rockefeller, who said, 'God gave me my money.' "
Canadian researcher Elizabeth Dunn reported this week that people who spend their money on others feel happier than those who spend it on themselves. According to old friend and finance colleague Foster Friess, this applies to Sir John. "I don't think he went out of his way to accumulate. It's just something that happens to people who are committed to serving others. It's not something he sought, but something that came to him because of his serving attitude.
"His faith dictated that the money wasn't really his anyway but that he was merely a steward of it. So that is probably why he was motivated to spend it in a way he thought would be pleasing to God."
"In general, the problem with our culture is narcissism, solipsism and selfishness," says Steven Post. "Sir John has always said to me, 'Just love and let everything else take care of itself.' He agrees with Abe Lincoln, who said we have to focus not on what we know, but on what we don't know.
"So, what I'm financing is humility. I want people to realize that you shouldn't think you know it all."

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Wow, Bear Stearns being bought out for $2 a share. Fucking scary. You never know.. Stay away from what one doesn't understand. Thankfully did not venture into financial shares because of lack of understanding. One exception is CNA, hope they will be ok.

What happens tomorrow, where does AMR go? Did I make a huge mistake with AMR too?
Scared but holding on, think it should still be ok.

Thursday, March 06, 2008

I think I may have made a mistake with AMR. Either they go into bankruptcy or should go back to 16-17 if oil falls a bit. Spinoff may yield some positive too. But debt load should have warned me. Bought CNA for retirement acct.

Not looking at account anymore due to AMR, did buy more but am on a lot of margin now. :(

Oh well, back to the poorhouse..

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Emory's Goizueta Business School and McCombs School of Business at UT Austin w/Mr. Buffett.

  • Charlie and I operated mostly with 5 positions. If I were running 50-200 million, I would have 80% in 5 positions, with 25% for the largest. In 1964 I found a position I was willing to go heavier into, up to 40%. The position was American Express. In 1951 I put the bulk of my net worth into GEICO.
  • Over the past 50-60 years, Charlie and I have never permanently lost more than 2% of our personal worth on a position. We’ve suffered quotational loss, 50% movements. That’s why you should never borrow money.
  • Snickers has been the #1 candy bar for the past 40 years. If you gave me $1 billion to knock off Snickers, I can’t do it. That’s the test of a good business.
  • To focus on what you don’t have is a terrible mistake. With the gifts all of us have, if you are unhappy, it’s your own fault.
  • If you have a lot of people that would hide you, then you can feel pretty good about how you’ve lived your life. I know people on the Forbes 400 list whose children would not hide them. The most powerful force in the world is unconditional love. The more you try to give it away, the more you get it back. At an individual level, it’s important to make sure that for the people that count to you, you count to them.
  • You like people who are generous, go out of their way, straight shooters.
  • The philosophy either takes immediately or it doesn’t at all. The reason gets down to temperament. People want to make money fast, but it doesn’t happen that way.
  • There is always some introduction of moral hazard when government decides to act in favor of the common good versus letting someone fail. I would be disinclined to second guess the Fed, they have more information and are trying to do what’s right.
  • Tell me who your heroes are and I’ll tell you how you’ll turn out to be.
  • What we are seeing is a huge repricing and evaluation of risk, correcting for problems of the past. I don’t know of good credit propositions that are going unfulfilled. There’s lots of cheap credit for sensible deals, which I don’t define as anything that happened over the last 12, 18 months. Comparatively, this is not a credit crunch. In 1982 the prime rate was 22%.
  • We’ve made lots of mistakes, but they don’t bother me. We are in the business of making many decisions and there are bound to be mistakes.
  • It just doesn’t pay to dwell on the bad things. Finding the right spouse is 90% of it. If you are lucky on health and lucky on your spouse, you are a long way home.
  • I recommend an index fund for these sovereign wealth funds. It gives them exposure to the US market, but they won’t get taken by salespeople with bad deals.
  • I don’t think there is much being overlooked now, but I’m forced to look at big things. In 1951, I used Moody’s and S&P manuals as my sources of information. I went through them page by page.
  • It’s also important to avoid managers who use leverage. It’s the reason that investors with 160 IQs flame out.
  • Behaving decent is a large part of it. I tried to be useful and visible. I gave him stock tips and kept up with him. Almost always good things come from good behavior. It’s good to have a willingness to pitch in when you aren’t going to get credit for it.
  • I just naturally want to do things that make sense. I don’t care what other rich people are doing. I don’t want a 405 foot boat just because someone else has a 400 foot boat.
  • My wife was responsible for bringing up the children. In my own life I did virtually no social functions or meetings that I didn’t want to do. I’ve not seen many males having to make tough choices. But women are the ones who have tough situations.

Friday, February 22, 2008

"Managing your career is like investing. The degree of difficulty does not count. So you can save yourself money and pain by getting on the right train."

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Short sale Q&A from WSJ

Placing a BidOn a Short Sale
By June Fletcher
Question: We are first-time home buyers and found a beautiful house being sold as a short sale. It seems too good to be true, and our real estate agent referred to short sales as playing a game of roulette. Are the risks involved with a short sale too much to handle?

Notice that I didn't put falling in love on this list, since that's what you shouldn't do with this house. A short sale, which involves buying a house for less than the amount the seller owes the lender, can be time-consuming, frustrating, and --- if the lender refuses your offer -- ultimately unsuccessful. If the agent you've been using doesn't want to get involved, ask him or her to refer you to someone who specializes in this sort of work. You also need to hire an attorney experienced in this kind of transaction.
But when home values are dropping, like they are in many places today, and the owner hasn't built up much equity, that's not an option. So some lenders will accept less than the amount owed to avoid the hassle and expense of auctioning the house, providing the owner proves that he doesn't have other assets to make up what he owes.
Even with experienced people at your side, it pays to arm yourself with facts before you make an offer. Don't assume that the house is a bargain, since the owner may have bought the house at the peak of the housing cycle and may owe so much that he can only discount it to current market prices. Find out what comparable houses are selling for, whether a foreclosure notice has been filed for the property, who owns the loan or loans, and how much is owed -- you'll have to deal with them all.
The seller may eagerly accept your offer, but he isn't the final arbiter of the deal -- the note holders are. So make your offer contingent on the acceptance of the lender or lenders. Since the lenders want to know that you can back up your offer, include as much information as you can on your financial resources, as well as a preapproval letter from a lender.
Although the property may be advertised as-is, make sure the deal gives you the right to have and approve home and pest inspections by qualified professionals. Short sellers usually have given up maintaining their homes; you need to know what other expenses to expect.
Also, place a time limit on your offer -- since lenders will sometimes drag their feet, hoping to get a better deal. Short sales rarely take a short time to complete, but you shouldn't wait forever.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Kahlil Gibran quotes :




  • I have learnt silence from the talkative, toleration from the intolerant, and kindness from the unkind; yet strange, Iam ungrateful to these teachers.


  • Out of suffering have emerged the strongest souls; the most massive characters are seared with scars.
  • Yes, there is a Nirvanah; it is leading your sheep to a green pasture, and in putting your child to sleep, and in writing the last line of your poem.
  • An eye for an eye, and the whole world would be blind.
  • And ever has it been known that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
  • Doubt is a pain too lonely to know that faith is his twin brother.


  • Faith is an oasis in the heart which can never be reached by the caravan of thinking.


  • Friendship is always a sweet responsibility, never an opportunity


  • Hallow the body as a temple to comeliness and sanctify the heart as a sacrifice to love; love recompenses the adorers.


  • If the other person injures you, you may forget the injury; but if you injure him you will always remember.


  • If you love somebody, let them go, for if they return, they were always yours. And if they don't, they never were.


  • Keep me away from the wisdom which does not cry, the philosophy which does not laugh and the greatness which does not bow before children.
  • Let there be no purpose in friendship save the deepening of the spirit.
  • Nor shall derision prove powerful against those who listen to humanity, for they shall live forever. Forever.
  • Of life's two chief prizes, beauty and truth, I found the first in a loving heart and the second in a laborer's hand.
  • Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge.
  • Safeguarding the rights of others is the most noble and beautiful end of a human being.
  • There are those who give with joy, and that joy is their reward.
  • What is this world that is hastening me toward I know not what, viewing me with contempt?
  • Wisdom ceases to be wisdom when it becomes too proud to weep, too grave to laugh, and too selfish to seek other than itself.
  • Work is love made visible. And if you cannot work with love but only with distaste, it is better that you should leave your work and take alms of those who work with joy.
  • Your daily life is your temple. When you enter into it take with you your all.
  • Your friend is your needs answered.

Friday, February 08, 2008

Another few lines about Templeton

Templeton is described as “one of the handful of true investment greats in a field crowded with mediocrity and bloated reputations.” He believes any investor would be foolish to restrict his investments to his home country. Seek out the world’s best investments, he advises, wherever they reside. In the 1950s, he poured shareholders’ money into the German and Japanese stock markets. With the wounds of WWII still fresh, investing in Japan was about as popular with Americans then as the idea of funding the Taliban today. But as these battered economies were gradually rebuilt, his investment returns were substantial. Today he still favors the investment outlook for emerging markets, particularly China. At the height of the Internet bubble, Templeton sold short dozens of young technology companies just before their shares came out of “lock-up,” the six-month cooling off period following an IPO. He made over $80 million in a matter of weeks. He still calls it “the easiest money I ever made.”
Templeton knows what it means to be a true contrarian. “To buy when others are despondently selling and to sell when others are avidly buying requires the greatest fortitude… and pays the greatest reward.” Wise words for those contemplating what to do in today’s volatile markets.

Templeton quotes social reformer Henry Beecher, “No man can tell whether he is rich or poor by turning to his ledger. It is the heart that makes a man rich. He is rich according to what he is, not according to what he has.” Templeton is a great believer that true wealth doesn’t come from making money, but from fulfilling a purpose outside ourselves, whether that’s exercising our talents, raising our kids to be happy, productive adults, or contributing to our communities in some meaningful way. As Templeton is fond of saying, “Happiness pursued eludes, happiness given returns.” “We’ve made you a few dollars?” I asked.He touched my arm, smiled and said “Oh, I’ve been far too fortunate in this life for money to make much difference.” What a charming answer…

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Put beautifully as always by Buffett.

TORONTO (Reuters) - But he warned that the U.S. dollar will continue to slide unless the country can rein in its yawning trade deficit -- the "biggest factor" behind the decline. Still, he said, the U.S. economy will "do very well over time."
Buffett, appeared to see irony in the fact that many of the banks who marketed complex investments which have now crashed are bearing much of the fallout.
"It's sort of a little poetic justice, in that the people that brewed this toxic Kool-Aid found themselves drinking a lot of it in the end".

Buffett said that the turmoil that has rocked the U.S. economy in recent months has imbued the markets with a healthy degree of caution, while the rate-cutting response from central bankers has ensured that cheap money remains available for borrowing.
"I wouldn't quite call it a credit crunch. Funds are available," Buffett said during a question and answer session. "Money is available, and it's really quite cheap because of the lowering of rates that has taken place."
He added: "What has happened is a repricing of risk and an unavailability of what I might call 'dumb money,' of which there was plenty around a year ago."
PBTS RULES Buffett tends to favor companies with relatively simple businesses, strong management, consistent earnings, good returns on equity, and little debt.

Monday, February 04, 2008

Hilarious article in the LA times today..

Perhaps a bit too stimulated - Joel Stein
The government should not be in charge of the economy. The government is super-insecure and desperate to be liked. So when the government senses you might blame it for something -- such as the fact that you spent $1 million on a three-bedroom house, and now you owe a ridiculous $1 million for a lousy three-bedroom house -- it panics and sends you a small check in the mail. No reasonable person would give us more money after what we've done with ours. They would tell us to put some cash in the bank and stop using the AmEx to make every appliance in our house either flat or made of stainless steel, as if we were preparing to trap "Superman II" villains.


But the government doesn't want us to bank that money. It believes we will spend the money, and that will make our houses worth a lot again. We would then buy clothes at Bebe, and the person who owns Bebe would buy the crappy house I overpaid for and get me out of the financial predicament. This might soften the recession if Milton Friedman hadn't proved 50 years ago that most people base spending decisions on long-term income projections. Unless we find a new bubble to invest in we're not going to spend our way out of this recession. We got here for the same reason people always get in trouble : We got over-excited. We ignored centuries of data saying real estate is a worse investment than stocks, and instead based our investment strategy on the fact that our neighbor just sold his house for a serious ton of money. We need to prevent our government from going deeper into debt, thus further devaluing our currency. So homeowners need to accept that they're not moving into a bigger house in three years, stock owners have to learn that their portfolios are going down for a while, and large tech companies have to stop paying hundreds of millions for social networking sites that kids get sick of after a while. An empire that believes spending is a patriotic act is perilously close to its end. But at least we will have left future civilizations the invention of the 10-year interest-only adjustable-rate sub-prime mortgage.

Sunday, February 03, 2008

Wonderful article in the Washington Post today by the Nickel and Dimed author.

While fortunes were being made in the time it takes to say "IPO," my $6-$8-an-hour co-workers lunched on hot dog buns because that was all they could afford and, in some cases, fretted about whether they could find a safe place to sleep.
We like to attribute our high productivity to technological advances and better education. But a revealing 2001 study by McKinsey & Co. also credited America's productivity growth to "managerial . . . innovations" and cited
Wal-Mart as a model performer, meaning that our productivity also relies on fiendish schemes to extract more work for less pay. Yes, you can generate more output per apparent hour of work by falsifying time records, speeding up assembly lines, doubling workloads and cutting back on breaks. That may look good from the top, but at the middle and the bottom, it can feel a lot like pain.
The old liberal certainty was that "full employment" would create a workers' paradise, with higher wages and bargaining power for the little guy and gal. What the liberals weren't counting on was a depressed minimum wage, weak unions and a witch's brew of management strategies to hold wages and salaries down.
I could see this when I was doing research for a book on white-collar unemployment in 2004. I met laid-off people who'd been searching for a job for over a year and ended up taking low-wage work as big-box sales clerks or even janitors.

A century ago, Henry Ford realized that his company would only prosper if his own workers earned enough to buy Fords. But, too many of our employers today haven't figured out that their cruelly low wages would eventually curtail their own growth and profits.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

TAX REPORT By TOM HERMAN
High Earners Face Surge in Tax Audits
The IRS is turning up the heat on high-income taxpayers, especially those who work for themselves. IRS officials say audits of taxpayers making $100,000 or more rose 14% last year from 2006. Recent IRS data also show a 29% increase in audits of people making $200,000 or more -- and an 84% surge in audits of those with incomes of $1 million or more.

IRS research indicates much of the tax-noncompliance is committed by self-employed workers, such as consultants and small-business owners, whose taxes aren't withheld from their pay and whose income isn't reported separately to the government. By contrast, compliance is much higher among people whose pay is reported by their employers and whose taxes are withheld from their pay.
This year, "we will continue to focus on audits of high-income individuals," Linda Stiff, the IRS's acting commissioner, said in an interview. She also says IRS agents are intensifying their focus on "abusive" tax shelters, loosely defined as transactions with no real business purpose other than to avoid taxes.
In addition, agents have increased audits of taxpayers involved in partnerships and businesses organized as "S corporations." With a typical S corporation, income isn't taxed at the corporate level. Instead, profits and losses flow through to shareholders, who are supposed to pay taxes at their own individual rates.

For the vast majority of taxpayers, the odds of getting audited remain quite low. Only about 1% of all individual income-tax returns filed in each of the past few years have been audited. But the chances of attracting the IRS's attention now are significantly higher than they were just a few years ago.
In fiscal 2007, the IRS examined a total of nearly 1.4 million individual income-tax returns. By contrast, the IRS audited only 617,765 returns in fiscal 2000. The IRS's "coverage" rate -- audits divided by total number of returns filed the previous year -- has also been rising in recent years. For fiscal 2007, it stood at 1.03%, up from 0.98% the prior year and 0.49% in 2000. Even so, it's lower than where it was as recently as 1997.
IRS coverage rates are rising especially rapidly for higher-income taxpayers:
The IRS audited 31,382 returns with incomes of $1 million and higher in fiscal 2007, up from 17,015 the prior year. The coverage rate rose to 9.25% from 6.30%.
The IRS audited 113,105 returns with income of $200,000 and higher, up from 87,558 the prior year. The coverage rate: 2.87%, up from 2.57%.
The IRS audited 293,188 returns with income of $100,000 and higher, up from 257,851. The coverage rate: 1.77%, up from 1.67%.
The IRS relies on numerous techniques to choose which returns are audited. Many returns are selected on the basis of a secret computerized-scoring system that the IRS recently has updated, which is based on a continuing research project involving in-depth audits of thousands of returns. Computer programs assign each tax return a score that evaluates the potential for inaccuracies, based on the IRS's experience with similar returns. IRS staffers then pore through those returns with the highest scores to see which would make the best targets.
Many returns are picked because of "mismatches" -- which means that something a taxpayer reported doesn't match what was reported separately to the IRS by employers, banks or other financial institutions. Thus, one way to reduce your chances of hearing from the IRS is to double-check your return to see if what you reported matches what appears on those forms.
Other returns get audited because they were done by a paid tax preparer whom the IRS suspects of wrongdoing. Still others are picked based on information the IRS has obtained through its growing efforts to identify promoters and participants of tax shelters and other abusive tax-avoidance transactions.
Some returns get selected because of a tip from confidential informants, such as former business partners, ex-spouses or an angry neighbor. Separately, thousands of audit victims are picked at random among various income groups.
Most IRS probes are conducted by mail and are known as "correspondence" audits. These focus on a limited number of specific issues on a return and are designed to address those topics that don't require a full-scale, face-to-face audit. More complex issues are handled through what are known as "field" audits and are conducted in person. These may involve a trip to an IRS office or to the taxpayer's home or business.
In fiscal 2007, just over one million of the 1,384,563 individual income-tax audits were correspondence audits. Of the 31,382 audits of people with income of $1 million and higher, 19,123 were correspondence audits and 12,259 were field audits.
One of the easiest ways to attract IRS attention in a hurry is to claim there's no law that you have to pay federal income taxes or even file a return. IRS officials refer to these and similar excuses as "frivolous" arguments.
Don't even think about trying to make such claims. Courts consistently reject them, and the penalty can be severe.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Success is having people love you that you want to have love you. - Buffett

It takes 20 years to build a repuatation and 5 minutes to ruin it. think about that and you'll do things differently.

What I'll do is form a partnership where I'll manage the portfolio and have my money in there with you. I'll guarantee you a 5% return, and I;ll get 20% of all profits after that. And i won't tell you what I own because that's distracting. All I want to do is hand in a scorecard when I come off the golf course.

There simply aren't enough saints available to staff a large institution that requires its members to voluntarily act against their own well-being.

The market is there only as a reference point to see if anybody is offering to do anything foolish. Charlie and I never have an opinion on the market because it might interfere with the opinions we have that are good.
Couldn't agree more!

"One should guard against preaching to young people success in the customary form as the main aim in life. The most important motive for work in school and in life is pleasure in work, pleasure in its result, and the knowledge of the value of the result to the community." -- Albert Einstein

On Walter schloss

Walter Schloss article in Forbes

At 91, the man Warren Buffett famously dubbed a "superinvestor" is still picking unloved stocks.
Walter Schloss has lived through 17 recessions, starting with one when Woodrow Wilson was President. This old-school value investor has made money through many of them. What's ahead for the economy? He doesn't worry about it.
A onetime employee of the grand panjandrum of value, Benjamin Graham, and a man his pal Warren Buffett calls a "superinvestor," Schloss at 91 would rather talk about individual bargains he has spotted. Bushy-eyebrowed and avuncular, Schloss has a laid-back approach that fast-money traders couldn't comprehend. He has never owned a computer and gets his prices from the morning newspaper. A lot of his financial data come from company reports delivered to him by mail, or from hand-me-down copies of Value Line, the stock information service.
He loves the game. Although he stopped running others' money in 2003--by his account, he averaged a 16% total return after fees during five decades as a stand-alone investment manager, versus 10% for the S&P 500--Schloss today oversees his own multimillion-dollar portfolio with the zeal of a guy a third his age. In a day of computer models that purport to quantify that hideous and mysterious force called risk, listening to Schloss talk of his simple, homespun investing methods is a tonic.

During his time as a solo manager after leaving Graham's shop, he was a de facto hedge fund. He charged no management fee but took 25% of profits. He ran his business with no research assistants, not even a secretary. He and his son, Edwin (who joined him in 1973), worked in a single room, poring over Value Line charts and tables.
In a famous 1984 speech titled the "The Superinvestor of Graham-and-Doddsville," Buffett said Schloss was a flesh-and-blood refutation of the Efficient Market Theory. Asked whether he considers himself a superinvestor, Schloss demurs: "Well, I don't like to lose money."
He has a Depression-era thriftiness that benefited clients well. His wife, Anna, jokes that he trails her around their home turning off lights to save money. Those beloved Value Line sheets are from his son, 58, who has a subscription. "Why should I pay?" Schloss says.
Featured in Adam Smith's classic book Supermoney (1972), Schloss amazed the author by touting "cigar butt" stocks like Jeddo Highland Coal and New York Trap Rock. Schloss, as quoted by Smith, was the soul of self-effacement, saying, "I'm not very bright." He didn't go to college and started out as a Wall Street runner in the 1930s. Today he sits in his Manhattan apartment minding his own capital and enjoying simple pleasures. "Look at that hawk!" he erupts at the sight of one winging over Central Park.
One company he's keen on now shows the Schloss method. That's the wheelmaker. Superior Industries International (nyse:
SUP - news - people ) gets three-quarters of sales from ailing General Motors (nyse: GM - news - people ) and Ford. Earnings have been falling for five years. Schloss picks up a Value Line booklet from his living room table and runs his index finger across a line of numbers, spitting out the ones he likes: stock trading at 80% of book value, a 3% dividend yield, no debt. "Most people say, 'What is it going to earn next year?' I focus on assets. If you don't have a lot of debt, it's worth something."

Schloss screens for companies ideally trading at discounts to book value, with no or low debt, and managements that own enough company stock to make them want to do the right thing by shareholders. If he likes what he sees, he buys a little and calls the company for financial statements and proxies. He reads these documents, paying special attention to footnotes. One question he tries to answer from the numbers: Is management honest (meaning not overly greedy)? That matters to him more than smarts. The folks running Hollinger International (other-otc:
HLGAF.PK - news - people ) were smart but greedy--not good for investors.
Schloss doesn't profess to understand a company's operations intimately and almost never talks to management. He doesn't think much about timing--am I buying at the low? selling at the high?--or momentum. He doesn't think about the economy. Typical work hours when he was running his fund: 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., only a half hour after the New York Stock Exchange's closing bell.
Schloss owns a prized 1934 edition of Graham's Security Analysis he still thumbs through. Its binding is held together by three strips of Scotch tape. In the small room he invests from now, across the hall from his apartment, one wall contains a half-dozen gag pictures of Buffett.


Schloss first met that more famous value hunter at the annual meeting of wholesaler Marshall Wells. The future billionaire was drawn there for the reason Schloss had come: The stock was trading at a discount to net working capital (cash, inventory and receivables minus current liabilities). That number was a favorite measure of value at Graham-Newman, the investment firm Schloss joined after serving in World War II. Buffett came to the firm after the Marshall Wells meeting, sharing an office with Schloss at New York City's Chanin Building on East 42nd Street.
Schloss left the Graham firm in 1955 and with $100,000 from 19 investors began buying "working capital stocks" on his own, like mattressmaker Burton-Dixie and liquor wholesaler Schenley Industries. Success drew in investors, eventually rising to 92. But Schloss never marketed his fund or opened a second one, and he kept money he had to invest to a manageable size by handing his investors all realized gains at year-end, unless they told him to reinvest.
In 1960 the S&P was up half a percentage point, with dividends. Schloss returned 7% after fees. One winner: Fownes Brothers & Co., a glovemaker picked up for $2, nicely below working capital per share, and sold at $15. In the 1980s and 1990s he also saw big winners. By then, since inventory and receivables had become less important, he had shifted to stocks trading at below book value. But the tempo of trading had picked up. He often found himself buying while stocks still had a long way to fall and selling too early. He bought Lehman Brothers (nyse:
LEH - news - people ) below book shortly after it went public in 1994 and made 75% on it in a few months. Then Lehman went on to triple in price.
Still, many of his calls were spot-on. He shorted Yahoo (nasdaq:
YHOO - news - people ) and Amazon before the markets tanked in 2000, and cleaned up. After that, unable to find many cheap stocks, he and Edwin liquidated, handing back investors $130 million. The Schlosses went out with flair: up 28% and 12% in 2000 and 2001 versus the S&P's --9% and --12%.
The S&P now is off 15% from its peak, yet Schloss says he still doesn't see many bargains. He's 30% in cash. A recession, if it comes, may not change much. "There're too many people with money running around who have read Graham," he says.
Nevertheless, he has found a smattering of cheap stocks he thinks are likely to rise at some point. High on his watch list (see table) is CNA Financial, trading at 10% less than book; its shares have fallen 18% in a year. The insurer has little debt, and 89% of the voting stock is owned by Loews Corp. (nyse:
LTR - news - people ), controlled by the billionaire Tisch family. He says buy if it gets cheaper. "I can't say people will get rich on it, but I would rather be safe than sorry," he says. "If it falls more, I won't worry about it. Let the Tisches worry about it."
Schloss flips through Value Line again and stops at page 885: Bassett Furniture, battered by a lousy housing market. The chair- and tablemaker is trading at a 40% discount to book and sports an 80-cent dividend, a fat 7% yield. Schloss mutters something about how book value hasn't risen for years and how the dividend may be under threat.
His call: Consider buying when the company cuts its dividend. Then Bassett will be even cheaper and it eventually will recover.
If only he had waited a bit to buy wheelmaker Superior, too. It's been two years since he bought in, and the stock is down a third. But the superinvestor, who has seen countless such drops, is philosophical and confident this one is worth book at least. "How much can you lose?" he asks.

Friday, January 18, 2008

AMR getting slaughtered again, not sure what I was thinking when added to it. Looks like dead money for a very long time :( Just when I need the cash for a house. Jumbos are charging very high rates, doesn't bode well for housing at all. The best time to be cash rich and buy down, and I don't hav cash :(

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Gary Moore, John Templeton. Look up a book later.

Templeton says buy at the point of maximum pessimism. Problem is how to know that it is the maximum pessimism ? Thought it was maximum pessimism at 19, 16, 15 for AMR. Then ran out of cash ;)
OMG, just have lost nearly two third of gains made. Blood letting continues on AMR. Is it options manipulation? Or something more severe?

Yes there's earnings concern with oil high, but they seem to have 21B in cash which seems enough to drag it through in the near term at least and not straight into bankruptcy.. Spin off will reduce debt more. Could have good value going ahead. Really tempted to buy more but don't want to increase margin position.

Oh well, atleast will end active investment by self. Debating on whether to buy KBH home.. tempting..

Friday, January 04, 2008

I was cheered to note that AMR held up better than the rest of the market today. Market darlings AAPL, CMG, MA, RIMM etc fell quite a bit.. Is the market finally getting a bit rational or will they just resume their relentless march higher ?

Tuesday, January 01, 2008

Ended 2007 with a 38.9% gain. Quite a comedown from earlier return because of AMR.
Better than s&p and dow anyway, also higher than last year.

So far am doing investment based on psychological factors, need to do more on financials than just psychology!

Viewed 127

Friday, December 28, 2007

Was out of VSE at a 34% profit last week, annualized about 60%. Ok.

AMR is suffering big time. All my fortunes are tied to it now. Doesn't look too good. It may go down to $11-12 and then won't be able to look at my brokerage account any more. Not that its easy now.. Selling seems overdone, but given huge debt and high oil prices, the market seems to be right in marking it down so much. May take a couple of years and some luck. Also, maybe coming consolidation in airlines and its spinoff of Eagle may be good for AMR. Suspect though that there may be year end tax selling that's also at play. The 30 day wash rule should make this one rebound a bit in February. Some of the favorite homes on Zillow seemed to have dropped in value recently, kind of heartening.

Had a great time in Maui. Also donated to Smile train today.

Saturday, November 24, 2007

From Investment Gurus by Peter Tanous:

Peter Lynch : The problem with technical analysis is that somebody could love the stock at 10 and hate it at 6. But I have traditionally liked one formation. The stock goes from 50 to 8, then is goes sideways for a few years between 8 and 11. Now if something goes right with this company, the stock is going north. These make a nice research list. You look at stocks that have bottomed out. Its like trying to catch a falling knife, you want the knife to stick in the wood. When it stops vibrating, you can pick it up.

Laura Sloate : In 1973, I couldn't find any stocks that were cheap enough. Management was on my case since I wasn't generating any commissions. At that point, I realized that if you worked for a big company, you would be controlled by the management.

If the average return on invested capital is less than the cost of the capital, you know its a poorly managed company. If we look at our stocks through 91-94, 12 of the 15 stocks that we sold because of a sell discipline of selling at 15% decline, 12 of these were higher six months later when we originally bought them, and a couple were real winners. So, we modified our sell discipline, we don't let it go down and not do anything. Its an evolution of process based on examination of results. Statistically we found that in 80% of the cases, if we had kept the stocks we sold six more months, we would have made money. Most of the bad stuff is in the price; we sometimes bought prematurely.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

From Friends, Lovers, Chocolate by Alexander McCall Smith:

A good work, once drawn attention to by its author inevitably becomes an exercise in self-congratulation.

It always surprised her that her niece seemed uninterested in what people did. For Isabel, it was fundamentally important information if one were even to begin to understand somebody.

A Scotswoman would expect equality and consideration in marriage unlike an Italian woman.

The sentiment sounded trite as most good sentiments did. It was hard to make goodness and good people sound interesting. Yet the good are worthy of note, because they battled and that battle was a great story.

The Germans deserved great credit for their moral seriousness, which is why Isabel liked them so much. Anyone was capable of doing what they did in their historical moment of madness - and their goodness lay in the fact that they later faced up to what they had done.

Everybody's job is like that, I wash things and then they become dirty again. Even the Queen's job is like that. The Queen signs one law and then they pass another. She opens one bridge and then they build another.

What is patriotism but the love of the good things that one saw and ate in childhood?

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

"Nothing gives one person so much advantage over another as to remain cool and unruffled under all circumstances." -- Thomas Jefferson
Wow, just shaved off about 25% of ytd return. Bought more AMR. just made a death wish most likely. OH well, need to go back and finish accounting book and corporate finance book. Also, ordered Martin Whitman's Value investing from the library. These three are essential.

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

From A Short History of Financial Euphoria by John Kenneth Galbraith :

The only remedy is an enhanced skepticism that would resolutely associate too evident optimism with probable foolishness and that would not associate intelligence with the acquisition or administration of large sums of money.

A further rule is that when a mood of excitement pervades a market or surrounds an investment prospect, when this is a claim of unique opportunity based on special foresight, all sensible people should circle the wagons; it is time for caution. Perhaps, indeed, there is opportunity, but a rich history provides proof that as or more often, there is only delusion or self-delusion.

So, comes down to being fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful. Buffett was right all along with his one liner as was Templeton.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

From Isabel in The Right Attitude to Rain :
That woman would like to be elsewhere thought Isabel; as so many people would. How many of us are happy to be exactly where we are at the moment? Only the completely happy think that they are in the correct place.

Never heard it put so well. Iam extremely happy :)

Why we need a recession -- soon
By Jon Markman
Check out the pessimistic housing headlines. When there's this much smoke, usually there is not just fire but a raging hell storm about to be cut loose. And Lord knows, there's much dry tinder available to the forces of financial doom, what with residential construction stopped cold, Detroit automakers idling and virtually the entire financial-services work force dusting off resumes.

So is the inferno really upon us? Well, no. And that's a pity because recessions clear out the excess optimism, debt and inventory that collect during long stretches of expansion. Moreover, a recession delayed may be a recession that turns into a real whopper.
Banking analyst Richard Bove points out that debt in the U.S. economy over the past 5 years has grown at a pace 3 times faster than income. Nominal gross-domestic-product growth has advanced at 3% while financial debt has grown at a 9.7% clip to $13.8 trillion.
As consumers collectively quit spending, retailers see inventories pile up, manufacturers fire workers, unemployment explodes and wage growth collapses.

Just as heroin dealers are in business to sell drugs, banks are in business to make loans. Their financial engineers will do everything in their power to force debt down consumers' throats.

Because the administration in Washington knows that if all those loans are called in and consumers can't make good on them, there will be hell to pay. And a nasty recession just won't do in an election year.
So the government is in the process of twisting the arms of Fed members to lower interest rates. That will allow banks to go back to one of their favorite recession-delaying ploys: encouraging debt-strapped consumers to refinance their loans at lower rates.

Banks took big write-downs this past October.
Investors will let them get away with that sort of rudeness only once. If the banks do it again -- shareholders are likely to slaughter the bank stocks, pushing them down at least another 20%.
"Bad loans are going onto their balance sheet faster than they can write them off," he said.
Once investors determine that the banks' bad loans are out of control and that the risk cannot be adequately measured, they will sell first and ask questions later. So, we are about to enter even more interesting times. A debt-led recession punctuated with joblessness and foreclosure is almost certainly en route. The only questions are whether it comes early next year or in 2009, and how deep a hole we'll need to dig for the burial. Whatever the timing or depth, continue to avoid the bank and brokerage stocks.

Fine print One of the first groups of companies to go in a recession: restaurants that serve the upper middle class. Recent victims include McCormick & Schmick's (MSSR, news, msgs) and P.F. Chang's China Bistro (PFCB, news, msgs).

Strangely, some stocks tend to do well in a recession, including REITs, insurance companies and, for some reason, containerboard makers. Also keep in mind that the best time to buy stocks for the long term is right smack in the middle of a recession, so you will want to start buying the banks and home builders once their currently hidden problems are more fully reflected in their stock prices. For more on the banks' issues, read my Sept. 14 column, "What the big banks aren't telling you -- yet."

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Samuel Johnson quotes this time..

  • A fly may sting a stately horse and make him wince; but one is but an insect, and the other is a horse still.
  • A wise man will make haste to forgive, because he knows the true value of time, and will not suffer it to pass away in unnecessary pain.
  • Books like friends, should be few and well-chosen.
  • Curiosity is one of the most permanent and certain characteristics of a vigorous intellect.
  • Where there is nothing but pure misery there never is any recourse to the mention of it.
  • Every man who attacks my belief, diminishes in some degree my confidence in it, and therefore makes me uneasy; and I am angry with him who makes me uneasy.
  • Getting money is not all a man's business: to cultivate kindness is a valuable part of the business of life.
  • I look upon every day to be lost, in which I do not make a new acquaintance.
  • If a man does not make new acquaintances as he advances through life, he will soon find himself left alone.
  • It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than open one's mouth and remove all doubt.
  • Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must first be overcome.
  • Poverty is a great enemy to human happiness; it certainly destroys liberty, and it makes some virtues impracticable.
  • Self-confidence is the first requisite to great undertakings.
  • The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good.
  • Those who attain any excellence, commonly spend life in one pursuit; for excellence is not gained upon easier terms.
  • To be happy at home is the ultimate result of all ambition.
  • We are inclined to believe those whom we do not know because they have never deceived us.
  • What is easy is seldom excellent.
  • What we hope ever to do with ease, we must learn first to do with diligence.
  • Worth seeing? Yes; but not worth going to see.
  • You can't be in politics unless you can walk in a room and know in a minute who's for you and who's against you.
  • You hesitate to stab me with a word, and know not - silence is the sharper sword.

Friday, October 12, 2007

Confucius quotes

  • "The strength of a nation derives from the integrity of the home."
  • "The superior man is distressed by the limitations of his ability; he is not by the fact that men do not recognize the ability that he has."
  • "The superior man is modest in his speech, but exceeds in his actions."
  • "Never contract friendship with a man that is not better than thyself."
    "The wheel of fortune turns round incessantly, and who can say if I shall today be uppermost."
  • "To be wronged is nothing unless you continue to remember it."
  • "It does not matter how slowly you go, so long as you do not stop."
  • "Instead of being concerned that you have no office, be concerned to think how you may fit yourself for office.
  • "To know, is to know that you know nothing. That is true knowledge."
  • "Five things constitute perfect virtue; gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness, and kindness."
  • "The cautious seldom err."
  • "Silence is a true friend who never betrays."
  • "Everything has beauty, but not everyone sees it."
  • "Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life."
  • "When anger rises, think of the consequences."
  • "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step."
  • "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Loath to leave the company, enjoying current visibility enormously. Feels good to work on projects that are wanted and cared about so much. First time working on highly visible projects and hope it lasts.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Buffett said that he had read Graham and Dodd's book many times and had even read it to his wife on their honeymoon in 1952.
"It might not seem romantic, but I felt she ought to read it," Buffett recalled.

Monday, October 01, 2007

Follow Your Bliss by Van Tharp
Author Joseph Campbell described the message of “follow your bliss” to be his ultimate teaching. It’s like a message from God. If you do what you love to do, then you are probably doing what the universe intends for you to do.
A few years ago I had a client who wanted to start trading. He still needed trading capital. Instead, he was busy building a house and investing all his time into that house.
I suggested that he meditate on —what he loved to do and what he was attached to in his life. Did he love his house so much that he was willing to spend the next 20 years at a job he hated just to pay for it? If you don’t love what you do, you’ll face stress and possible burnout. If you love what you do, then you’ll have the energy and excitement to make what you want a reality.

Quiet your mind and let your thoughts come and go. Afterwards write down a list of all of the things/activities you really love. What really turns you on?

Then make a list of the things to which you are attached-things really important to you. Now, notice if there are any of your attachments that are so important that you would be willing to make you spend 20 years of your life doing something you hate.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Beautiful article in WSJ : The Secrets of Intangible Wealth by Ronald Bailey

A Mexican migrant is five times more productive in the US than he is back home. Why is that ?
According to some remarkable but largely ignored research - by the World Bank, of all places - it is because the average American has access to $418,000 of intangible wealth, while the stay-at-home Mexican's intangible wealth is just $34,000. But what is intangible wealth and how is it measured ? Two years ago, World Bank set out to assess the contributions of various kinds of capital to economic development. Its study "Where is the Wealth of Nations ? Measuring capital for the 21st century", began by defining natural capital as the sum of nonrenewable resources and produced or built capital as sum of machinery, infrastructure etc. But once the value of all these are added, the economists found something big was missing : The vast majority of the world's wealth!

The rest of the result of the "intangible factors"-such as the trust among people in a society, an efficient judicial system, clear property rights and effective government. All this intangible capital also boosts productivity and results in higher total wealth. 80% of wealth in rich countries and 60% in poor countries is of this intangible type. What the World bank economists have done brilliantly is to quantify the intangible value of education and social institutions. The bottom line : "Rich countries are largely rich because of the skills of their populations and the quality of the institutions supporting economic activity." The rule of law accounts for 57% and education accounts for 36% of intangible capital. Switzerland scored 99.5 on the rule-of-law index while the US scored 91. By contrast Nigeria's score on this is 5.8. Overall the average per capita wealth in the OECD countries is $440,000, consisting of $10,000 in natural capital, $76,000 in produced capital and a whopping $360,000 in intangible capital. Low income countries in contrast have $7,216 per person. Consists of $2,075 in natural capital. $1,150 in produced capital and $3,991 in intangible capital. Through rampant corruption, some are destroying their intangible capital and ensuring that their people will be poorer in the future. Who wouldn't walk across the border in such circumstances?

The World bank study bolsters the deep insights pf the late development economist Paul Bauer. In his brilliant "Dissent on Development" Bauer wrote : If all conditions for development other than capital are present, capital will soon be generated... If however the conditions for development are not present, then aid will be necessarily unproductive and therefore ineffective. Thus if mainsprings of development are present, material progress will occur even without foreign aid. If they are absent, then it will not occur even with aid. This path breaking study demonstrates that the mainsprings of development are the rule of law and a good school system. The big unanswered question is : How can people rid themselves of the kleptocrats who loot their countries and keep them poor?

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Buffett went on to stress the importance of temperament when it comes to investing, saying: “Independent thinking, emotional stability and a keen understanding of both human and institutional behaviour is vital to long-term investment success.”

Monday, September 03, 2007

The Rule of 72

The 'Rule of 72' is a simple way to calculate the number of years to double your money : divide 72 by your annual returns and the number of years it takes your money to double follows.

So, if you expect an annual return of 12%, it takes 6 years to double your money (72 / 12 = 6). You can also calculate the 'required return': Divide 72 by the number of years. If you have 10 years to double your money, you need 72 /10 = 7.2%. Only 5 years? Your required annual return would be 72 /5 = 14.4.

Monday, August 20, 2007

From Bertrand Russell's "In Praise of Idleness". Would not survive without his writings.

There will be happiness and joy of life, instead of frayed nerves, weariness, and dyspepsia. Originality will be unhampered, and there will be no need to conform. Ordinary men and women, having the opportunity of a happy life, will become more kindly and less persecuting and less inclined to view others with suspicion. Good nature is, of all moral qualities, the one that the world needs most, and good nature is the result of ease and security, not of a life of arduous struggle. Hitherto we have continued to be as energetic as before machines; we have been foolish.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Charles Ellis

From Charles Ellis's book "Winning the Loser's Game", this book was actually written for professional money managers :

  • In a loser's game, the outcome is determined by the mistakes made by the loser.
  • In amateur tennis, the victor gets a higher score because his opponent is losing even more points.
  • So staying back, and keeping the ball in -- is good strategy for amateur tennis players.
  • Focus on not making mistakes.
  • Regression to the mean is too powerful.
  • Despite the enticing appeal of reducing market exposure by astute sales when the securities appear to be overpriced and boldly reinvesting when prices have declined to attractive low levels, market timing does not work.
  • So much of the "action" occurs in such brief periods and at times when we are captives of conventional consensus.
  • Taking out the 10 best days from a 5 year period, reduced the return from 18% to 12%.
  • Impossible to know when the "best" days will occur.
  • Better to stay invested waiting for the "best" days rather than miss out.
  • So, say the "long-termers", stay invested through the rough times, that's the only sane ways to make sure you're there for the good times!
  • Unfortunately, security analysis, does not appear to be a useful or profitable activity. Stocks that investment managers sell after doing fundamental research , and the stocks they don't buy, typically do as well as the stocks they do buy.
  • Problem is that security analysis is done so very well by so many.
  • You can do more for your portfolio by developing and sustaining wise long-range policies than by skillful manipulations of the individual holdings within the portfolio.
  • Time is Archimedes' lever in investing
  • Give a portfolio time to evolve.
  • Sell when you want to, not when you have to.
  • If the time period is long, the wise investor can commit without great anxiety to investments that in the short run appear to be very risky.
  • Time transforms investments from least attractive to most attractive.
  • 3 types of risks : Price risk (price paid), interest rate risk, business risk (business failure).
  • The central fact about both stock group risk and individual stock risk is that "they do not need to be accepted" by the investor. They can be eliminated. Risk that comes from investing in particular market segments or specific issues can be diversified away - to oblivion.
  • The great secret for success in long-term investing is to avoid serious losses.
  • POLICY is the MOST EFFECTIVE ANTIDOTE to PANIC.
  • If a major decision is truly fiduciary in nature, it never needs to be done quickly. Time urgent decisions are never fiduciary.
  • The long, sad history of market timing is clear: Virtually nobody gets it right even half the time. And cost of getting it wrong wipes out the occasional gain of getting it right.
  • If you find yourself caught up in the excitement or a rising market or distressed by a falling market, STOP. Break it off. Go for a walk and cool down.
  • When you feel euphoric, you are probably in for a bruising.
  • When you feel down, remember its darkest hour before dawn- and take no action.
  • The secret to long-term success is benign neglect.
  • Leave compounding alone to do its good work for you.
  • Most of our blunders are emotional, not computational. How your investments behave is beyond your control. But how you behave in response to fluctuations is within your control.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

From one of my favorite books "John Neff on investing" :

  • If we shared a compartment on a long train ride, what you read here is what I would tell you about investing.
  • Individuals enjoy a key advantage over professionals, you can pick and choose and bide your time unflustered by the fierce and corrosive quarterly performance sweepstakes.
  • Value investing demands sober reflection. Scarce to begin with, and even scarcer in bull markets.
  • Now and then a windfall, but mostly a trudge. If you're in too big a hurry, a mattress may be better to store your money.
  • I attribute success not to genius or blinding insights, but to a frugal nature and lessons well-learned.
  • The more I delve into the past, the more I see lessons that ultimately played out in my choice of career. Perseverance, sympathy for the woebegone, frugality, stubbornness, and integrity, together with an inclination to flout convention and a penchant for rigorous analysis-these qualities form the building blocks for a successful investment strategy.
  • Shortcuts usually grease the rails to disappointing outcomes.
  • Bargain shopping made an impression on me. I've never bought a stock unless it was on sale.
  • I was probably not the easiest of sons to deal with, but he was a difficult man. Over the slightest infractions, he harangued people who worked for him. His behavior did not fit my definition of civility. Though ethical and honest, he was extremely demanding and especially sympathetic. To some degree, I inherited his tendency to be demanding. But my father was not very happy, and bitterness added sting to his demands.
  • The capacity of investors to believe in something too good to be true seems almost infinite at times.
  • We followed one durable investment style whether the market was up, down or indifferent. (Low P/E, Growth excess of 7%, Yield protection, Solid companies in growing fields, Strong fundamental case)
  • You don't need stunning growth rates. Absent stunning growth rates, low P/E stocks can capture the wonders of P/E expansion with less risk than skittish growth stocks.An increase in the P/E ration coupled with improved earnings, turbocharges the appreciation potential. e.g. (Static P/E : EPS - $2, Market price - $26, P/E - 13, Growth - 11%, Expected earnings - $2.22, New P/E - 13, New Market price - $28.86, Appreciation potential - 11% VS Expanded P/E : EPS - $2, Market price - $16, P/E - 8, Growth rate - 11%, Expected Earnings - $2.22, New P/E - 11, New Market price - $24.42, Appreciation potential - 53%)
  • Windsor was not fancy. As in tennis, I tried to keep the ball in play and let my adversaries make the mistakes. I picked stocks with low p/e multiples primed to be upgraded in the market if they were deserving, and endeavored to keep losers at break-even levels.
  • For Windsor's purposes, a low p/e multiple usually languished 40-60% below the prevailing market multiples.
  • Low p/e companies growing faster than 7% a year tipped us off to underappreciated signs of life, particularly if accompanied by an attention-getting dividend.
  • When news circluates that a company has missed an earnings estimate, it is normally compared to a consensus. If the company's fundamentals remain strong, low p/e investors often recognize buying opportunities.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

The Tao of Buffett.

  • The smarter the journalists are, the better off society is.
  • My idea of a group decision is to look in the mirror. (Has a history of standing alone that dates back to the early days of his investments.)
  • Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget rule number 1. (Apparently he drove an old VW beetle long after being a multimillionaire. Didn't know that)
  • You can' make a good deal with a bad person. (If you even have to ask yourself if you trust somebody, you should immediately leave the negotiating table and look for more honest company to do business with)
  • If is easier to stay out of trouble than get out of trouble.
  • It is not necessary to do extraordinary things to get extraordinary results.
  • My idea of a group decision is to look in the mirror.(Not one to seek affirmation from others, because so many of his ideas are opposite from what the herd is thinking.To make big money you have to be comfortable standing alone)
  • With each investment you make, you should have the courage and conviction to place at least 10% of your net worth in that stock.
  • Accounting is the language of business. (When Warren was asked by the daughter of one of his business associates what courses to take in college, he replied "Accounting - it is the language of business")
  • Read Graham and Fisher, read annual reports but don't do equations with Greek letters in the them.
  • There comes a time when you ought to start doing what you want. Take a job that you love. You will jump out of bed in the morning. I think you are out of your mind if you keep taking jobs that you don' like because you think it will look good on your resume.
  • The business schools reward difficult, complex behavior more than simple behavior, but simple behavior is more effective.
  • There is nothing like writing to force you to think and get your thoughts straight.(If you can't write about it, you haven't really thought about it).
  • The less prudence with which others conduct their affairs, the greater prudence with which we should conduct our own affairs.
  • A person's main asset is themselves, so preserve and enhance yourself.
  • In the search for companies to acquire, we adopt the same attitude one might find appropriate in looking for a spouse: It pays to be active, interested, and open-minded, but it does not pay to be in a hurry.
  • We simply attempt to be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.
  • If you don't make mistakes, you can't make decisions.
  • If you understand an idea, you can express it so others can understand it.
  • If they need my help to manage the enterprise, we are probably both in trouble.
  • At the beginning, prices are driven by fundamentals, and at some point, speculation drives them. What the wise man does in the beginning, the fool does in the end.
  • The smartest side to take in a bidding war is the losing side.
  • Great investment opportunities come around when excellent companies are surrounded by unusual circumstances that cause the stock to be mis-appraised.
  • Uncertainty is the friend of the buyer of long-term values.
  • We do not have and never will have an opinion on where the market, interest rates or business activity will be in a year from now.
  • That which is not worth doing is not worth doing well.
  • I buy stocks when the lemmings are headed the other way.
  • You only have to do a very few things right in your life so long as you don't do too many things wrong.(Warren decided early in his investing career that it would be impossible for him to make hundreds of right investment decisions, so he decided only to invest in businesses he was absolutely sure of and then bet heavily on them).
In the short run the market is like a voting machine and in the long run it is a weighing machine. Just really understood this today. The weighing machine is never wrong! So in the long term, the market will get it right. From Joel Greenblatt:
  • Over the short term, Mr Market acts like a wildly emotional guy who can buy and sell businesses at highly depressed or highly inflated prices.
  • Over the long run, Mr Market gets it right.

So if do have bad stocks, be scared that Mr Market will get it right soon enough. :(

Thursday, July 26, 2007

Kelly criterion and probability, stock will go down after purchase

  • Answer: People overweight the most recent information. They overreact to dramatic information, or dramatic circumstances. They tend to have what's called outcome bias, which is they judge things on their outcome, and not on their process.
  • Question: What's the Kelly criterion?
    Answer: What it tells you is what fraction of your bank roll you should commit to any particular probabilistic endeavor, if you know the probabilities that pertain to it. And if you know those preconditions, you will either maximize your bankroll at the fastest possible rate, or you'll minimize your loss at the slowest possible rate.
    The rough formula, is:
    2p - 1
    where p is the probability [converted from percentage to decimal form]. So, to make it easy, if you were 100% certain that a particular investment would pay off at your expected rate, then 2 times that p is 2.0, minus 1, yields 1. That means 100% of your bankroll should go into that investment.
    Now if you were only 60% sure, then it would be two times .60, which is 1.20, minus 1, equals .20. So 20% of your bankroll should go into that proposition.
    It also shows that if you have less than a 50/50 proposition, you shouldn't bet at all. Which again, makes perfect sense.
  • You have to be confident that you have an edge, And if you can't identify that edge, you probably don't have it. And if you can't identify it, you probably shouldn't commit the capital to it.
  • Answer: I would advise them basically to understand, A) people are overconfident, B) that therefore whatever probability you think you have of being right, it's probably less than you think. If you think you have a small edge, you probably don't have any edge at all.
  • You know, Bernard Baruch said nobody buys at the bottom and sells at the top except for liars. So what follows from that is, if you're not buying at the bottom and selling at the top, then that stock will go down after you bought it. And it will go up after you sold it.
  • Answer: Right. So you need to understand that your stock will go down after you buy it, and it will go up after you sell it. But what you want it to do is go down immediately after you bought it, and be lower then. You don't want it to be lower three years, or five years, or ten years. If you understand this, then the strategy of being willing to lower your average cost [by buying more when a stock drops] is a great strategy.
  • Question: I have a theory that great investors are not unemotional, but inversely emotional: They get worried when the market is making most people happy, and they feel good when everyone else is worried about it. Ben Graham had that quality, and so does Warren Buffett. Do you see that in yourself?
  • Answer: [veteran trader] Richard Dennis got these 10 people he was going to teach how to trade according to his system. And the system was mechanical. There was no judgment involved. And as it turned out, that after two months of trading, he was the only one of the 10 people that actually followed the system.
  • And the reason was, all these behavioral things. Because the system showed you lots of losses. And then it would tend to show you big gains. The losses made people nervous, and so the whole point of the book is that Dennis actually had understood or internalized, that there was a whole plethora of behavioral anomalies that will keep people from behaving optimally in capital markets.
  • Can an individual investor do what you've done - beat the market for years ?
    Answer: Oh, sure. I think that individuals [are not hampered by the obstacles] that prevent many professionals from behaving in optimal ways.
    And, more importantly, a thoughtful individual investor doing a moderate amount of homework can easily do better than the S&P 500.
    Because that portfolio which is diversified, is just allowed to evolve. They just let the portfolio evolve over time.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

"It's much harder to be the guy, the guy losing money three hundred and sixty-four days out of three hundred and sixty-five,because you start questioning yourself. Am I ever going to make it back? Am I really right? What if it takes ten years? Will I even be sane ten years from now?"

Sunday, July 22, 2007

Here is what I bought "The Night of the Generals" for :

  • "There's a sort of brotherhood which isn't dependent on the accident of blood relationship and has nothing in common with the herd instinct. I drink to the brotherhood of reasonable men"
  • "To train a man in blind obedience is tantamount to fostering stupidity. It has nothing to do with leadership. An attempt to inculcate culture and knowledge, on the other hand, presupposes culture and knowledge on the part of the teacher. Building up an army must be a mental process. If you are training a soldier to preserve peace you must train him to be a human being"
  • "A general knows that in war-time he must be prepared to take this hardest of decisions unflinchingly. That being so, he has no choice but to approach his task with profound humility. He must be fully aware of his special relationship to the highest price a human being can pay"
Also thought of "Letters from Iwo Jima" when reading this. Helpless to think of jawans under control of ruthless stupid men. How do these ever become generals? Are we a stupid race overall to allow the worst of men to be our leaders? Why is stupidity and cruelty so pervasive?
Salivating over BAC and C. Why didn't I buy LYO after reading the round table ?! Lost a good opportunity. Another decent one seems KAMN. Went to jazzercise today.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

To be happy at home is the desired result of all ambition. - Samuel Johnson.

Hmm, no need for more ambition from me, Iam already happy as a lark at home :) Now if only that WFMI would go up.. that would be perfect!

Sunday, July 08, 2007

Inner Game of Tennis quotes

Federer definitely has the Inner Game but Nadal should have won today, he was the better player to watch.

Quotes from the Inner Game of Tennis

  • Conscious trying often produces negative results.
  • The best players know that their peak performance never comes when they're thinking about it.
  • "Getting it together" requires slowing the mind. Quieting the mind means less thinking, calculating, judging,worrying, fearing, trying, regretting or hoping. One should try and increase the frequency of quieting the mind.
  • When we unlearn how to be judgemental, it is possible to achieve spontaneous, concentrated play.
  • But who said that Iam to be measured by how well I do things? In fact, who said that I should be measured at all? Who indeed? The value of a human being cannot be measured by performance.
  • As long as Self 1 (the conscious self- teller) is ignorant of the true capabilties of Self2(doer), he is likely to mistrust it. This causes him to try too hard, self-condemn and be judgemental. Trust yourself instead.
  • Relaxation produces smooth strokes and results from accepting your strokes even if they are erratic
  • Perhaps a better way to describe a player who is "unconscious" is by saying that his mind is so concentrated, so focused, that it is still.

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

From this article on non-conformists, fear same for Tulip :

Then there was my daughter, who was dressed in a demure skirt and blouse. A stranger would never have picked her out as a potential rebel; if anything, she has always been determined not to stand out.

My daughter, who, underneath her shy and somewhat diffident exterior, has always harbored the soul of an iconoclast. While I am volubly contrarian, she has always quietly done her own thing. The truth is, I am of mixed minds about having handed on the mantle of dissent to my daughter. I worry that her instinct to think for herself is as much a curse as a blessing — that she will, end up standing warily on the sidelines.

So although I admire my freethinking daughter, I also feel anxious on her account. My hope is that her idiosyncratic take on the world will lead her to unexpected places rather than to an embittered outlook. Here was a girl who eschewed getting smashed and hooking up.Far safer to bet that she’d get with the program in her own laggardly time and unlemminglike way.
Was reading the Dhando Investor by Pabrai. Talks of the business communities in India.

Marwaris : Simply expect all their invested capital to be returned in the form of dividends in no more than three years. They expect that, after having gotten their money back, their principal investment continues to be worth at least what they invested in it. They expect these to be ultra-low risk bets.

If you use this calculation, you'd quickly take a pass on most investments offered to you.

Free cash flow = money that can be removed from the business

Saturday, June 23, 2007

John Templeton interview here.

Q: What signs helped you see that the U.S. technology bubble was about to burst back in 2000?
John Templeton: If you want to have a better performance than the crowd, you must do things differently from the crowd. Four years ago the crowd was piling into tech stocks. The prices went sky-high. I sold my clients' technology stocks, and sold a lot of them short. I have put these philosophies into a simple statement: Help people. When people are desperately trying to sell, help them and buy. When people are enthusiastically trying to buy, help them and sell.

Q: That's a good way to look at it.
John Templeton: That's mainly a joke.